Newsletter: Legislative Report. Vol. 1. Issue 5
May 2003
Legislature Fails to Pass Workers' Compensation Reform - Mary Ann Stiles
The bad news is that the business community of this state has lost in its
efforts for the third year in a row to reform workers' compensation. The Florida
Legislature ended at 6:20 p.m. on May 2, 2003 without the Senate taking up the
bill that was sent to the Senate by the House this morning. The House had
refused to concur in the Senate amendments. The House bill was the bill pushed
by the business community and the insurance industry. It would have lowered
rates by -14.15% with an additional rate reduction for the construction industry
of -4% for a total of -18.15% for construction.
In a state that has the highest rates in the nation; where permanent total
claims are 5 times higher than the national average; where hospital outpatient
care is the most expensive in the nation; and where attorneys cause a 40%
increase per claim than an attorney in any other state due to the excessive
hourly rates no other state allows; and, where fraud is rampant because of the
exemptions in the construction industry, the business community still failed.
The good news is that the issue of workers' compensation will most likely be
the subject of a Special Session to deal with that issue. Although it was
announced that the Legislature will be back for a Special Session on May 12th to
address budget issues and will stay here through May 23rd, no mention was made
of taking up workers' compensation at that time. The Governor has made this
issue a high priority in his administration and has insisted that rates be
reduced by -15% across the board.
Many misconceptions, misinterpretations, and statements that, at the very
least, were misleading regarding workers' compensation, coupled with the fact
that the House and the Senate failed to reach agreement on several major issues,
killed workers' compensation reform for the session.
If the business community over the next month does not stand up and be heard
in their local communities and let each legislator in its district know that
your business cannot afford the high rates that are being charged; that your
business is having to cut back on expenses and personnel and that the other
businesses that you compete with do not even bother to carry coverage; and, if
we do not make our voices louder than the claimants' attorneys, we will not be
successful in getting a meaningful bill passed during Special Session either.
The number of claimants' attorneys and defense attorneys standing outside
both chambers to grab Senators and Representatives when they came out the door
to convince them not to do anything this session or at least allow a higher
attorneys fee than the House allowed, was simply astounding. This was my 30th
year lobbying workers' compensation and I have never seen the likes of it.
If we do not make our voices heard, a bill might pass Special Session, but it
will not resolve the major problems with the Florida's workers compensation law.
Rates will continue to climb, insurance carriers will not write in this state,
new businesses will not move to Florida and some businesses that are currently
operating in Florida will fold.
Please make your position known to those who vote.
History of House Bill 1837 on Workers' Compensation Reform - Mary Ann
Stiles, Tamela I. Perdue
The House of Representatives considered workers' compensation over the course
of two days during the legislative session. The House first considered CS/HB
1837 regarding workers' compensation on Friday, April 25, 2003, but completed
its work on this issue Monday, April 28, 2003. In the end, the House completed
its work on a bill that provided a -14.15% cost savings to Florida's employers,
with another -4%, or total -18.2% savings for the construction industry. It was
supported by the employers and carriers throughout the state.
The bill as it initially came out of the House Insurance Committee increased
costs by 10.4%. To correct this, the House State Administration Committee
adopted a strike all amendment to reduce costs, which was introduced by
Representatives Mack, Ross, Berfield, and Brown, who were involved with this
issue throughout the committee process. Rep. Mack had originally filed a workers
compensation bill that was supported by a Coalition of Business and Insurance
Industry. When the committee substitute arrived on the floor of the House, it
eliminated the exemptions in the construction industry, except for up to 3
corporate officers owning 10% each of the corporation. CS/HB 1837 also adjusted
the current structure of the JUA to bring available and affordable coverage to
more employers. The bill corrected the Turner decision and required a showing of
intent to harm through clear and convincing evidence before allowing an employer
to be sued civilly, in addition to the workers' compensation benefits being
provided. It provided for a very tight definition of permanent total disability
and eliminated the social security standard to determine such benefits in
Florida. It also provided that attorneys fees would be paid based on a statutory
formula of 18/13/8/5 percentage to create a contingency fee without hourly rates
to claimants' attorneys. It provided for an offer of judgment 30 days prior to
final hearing. The bill corrected the Burger King and Wilkins decisions for the
payment of supplemental benefits and stopped all supplemental benefits paid for
impairments higher than 20%. It also cleaned up the definition of how to
calculate the average weekly wage by eliminating the 91 day requirement,
eliminated the week of injury from calculation and required that wages would be
calculated on 75% rather than 90% of l3 weeks. The bill also clarified the time
lines for mediations, including that mediation is not to be scheduled before
expiration of the 30 days in which the employer/carrier can respond to a
petition for benefits, but insuring that the final hearing occurs within 210
days after the petition is filed.
Several amendments were filed on the House floor attempting to eliminate many
of the areas of critical concern to the business community and insurance
industry. These efforts failed. Additional amendments were filed to change the
calculation of impairment benefits after maximum medical improvement; increased
fees paid to physicians while at the same time reducing out patient expenses
incurred at hospitals; and changed the formula by which pharmacies are paid.
All was going well until the amendment process took an unexpected turn when
Representative Seiler sponsored an amendment, supported by the claimant's
attorneys and Representative Berfield, which unexpectedly passed, allowing
defense attorney fees to be equal to claimant attorney fees. The consequence of
this move was to re-introduce hourly rate attorney fees. Once this amendment
passed, the House adjourned for the weekend with no further amendments, motions
or debate on the bill. Accordingly, the bill and all pending amendments were
rolled over to Third Reading, available for final passage on Tuesday, April 29,
2003, following a two-day waiting period. Prior to that amendment, the House had
a bill that reduced rates by -15% plus an additional -4% for the construction
industry. The result of that amendment reduced the savings on rates to -10%
savings plus an additional -4% savings for the construction industry
The House leaders spent a good part of the weekend crafting an amendment that
would reinstate the savings. These efforts were led by Representatives Goodlette,
Bense, Brown, Ross, Seiler and Clarke. The results were: (1) stop permanent
total benefits at age 75 rather than 65 plus 5 years; eliminate the word
"part time" from the definition of sedentary employment in permanent
total cases; (2) eliminate the attorneys fees provision adopted on Friday and
increase the formula for attorneys fees to 20/15/10/5 with no exceptions for
hourly rates; and (3) enhance training and education to include securing a GED,
and provide such education to those who are unable to earn at least 80% of their
compensation rate, and provide that these benefits are not in addition to the
l04 weeks already provided in the statute for temporary disability benefits.
These benefits would be paid for by the Workers Compensation Administrative
Trust Fund.
The bill as amended provided for an increase in medical fees to 110% of
Medicare for physicians and 140% of Medicare for surgical services. The hospital
fee reimbursement schedule is reduced to cover the cost of providing these
increases to the doctors, in order to bring good doctors back into the system.
This issue alone creates a cost increase of +1.4%, but is necessary to provide
quality health care to injured workers. Another medical issue addressed is the
increase of chiropractic visits to 24 visits or 12 weeks, whichever is earlier.
These costs are offset by the decrease in outpatient and pharmacy payments.
The House bill also included employee leasing companies in the definition of
"employer" for purposes of providing workers' compensation coverage.
There were also administrative measures in the bill written to ensure that
disputes are resolved more quickly and efficiently with stiffer penalties on
employers and carriers who deny benefits to injured workers that should be paid.
CS/HB 1837, overwhelmingly passed the House on Thursday, May 1, 2003, by a
vote of 104-10. This bill has a -14.15% savings, plus an additional -4% savings
for the construction industry, for a total of -18.15%.
The bill then went to the Senate and the Senate took up the House bill,
instead of SB 1132. Even though the House warned that if the Senate sent back
any amendments on it bill, the Senate adopted 4 substantive amendments and two
title amendments that reduced the savings to less than -14.15%.
The Senate amendments that were adopted were:
- A late filed amendment by Senator Alexander changed the house language on
attorneys' fees from the current statutory formula of 20% of the first
%5,000; l5% of the next $5,000; l0% of the remaining amount of benefits
secured during the first l0 years and 5% of the benefits secured after l0
years, without any exceptions for hourly rates. They then adopted a formula
of 20% of the first $5000; l5% of the remaining amount during the first l0
years after the date the claim is filed. In lieu of that formula, the judge
can approve a fee not to exceed $l,500 at a maximum hourly rate of $l50 per
hour, if the benefits secured are less than $l0,000. In those cases where
the carrier denies an injury and the claimant prevails on compensability, in
lieu of the attorneys fees equal to l5% of all benefits secured, the judge
may award up to $l,500 based on a maximum rate of $l50 an hour.
- A second late filed amendment filed by Senators Clary and Atwater made
significant changes to the JUA. The JUA is to be actuarially sound and must
not be competitive with the voluntary market, therefore allowing the JUA to
be the last resort for coverage. The plan creates Tiers One and Two that can
not exceed 125% of approved rates. Tier One must include employers whose
premium does not exceed $20,000 and an no lost time claims nor incurred
medical only claims exceeding 50% of the premium in the preceding two years.
Tier Two must include employers who are unable find coverage in the
voluntary market but have an experience mod factor of l.05 or less, and
employers that are charitable and nonprofit organizations. A third tier is
created for all other employers. This tier must be actuarially sound and be
self supporting. If the plan issues assessable policies such insures in Tier
Three is liable on a pro rata basis for any deficits. If Tiers One or Two
have a deficit, the department shall transfer a one time allocation of an
amount not to exceed $5 million, subject to appropriation by the
Legislature. After the transfer, if a deficit exists, the plan can levy
assessments upon all workers compensation policy holders not to exceed 2% of
each policy holder's annual premium in any calendar year. Such assessments
shall be collected by the carrier as a separate line item, in addition to
the premiums charged by the insurers. If a deficit exists in Tier Three, the
deficit may be funded through increased premiums charged to insureds of the
plan.
- An Amendment by Senator Campbell weakened the House Mental or Nervous
injuries language by eliminating the language that provided that in no event
shall benefits for a mental or nervous injury be paid for more than 3 months
after the date of maximum medical improvement.
- Senator Posey filed an amendment that clarified what an affiliated person
is who is delinquent in paying a stop-work order and penalty assessment to
make it more difficult for someone to get around the order or assessment.
- Senator Posey also filed an amendment which passed on voice vote to allow
the Chief Financial Officer to contract with state attorneys in the three
largest judicial circuits to prosecute criminal violations of the workers
compensation law to be paid from the Workers Compensation Trust Fund. The
amendment further allows the employer or carrier to request from the
unemployment compensation records, wages of an employee reported by any
employer. The employer must consent as must any employer who paid the wages
to the employee subsequent to the date of accident. Further requires an
annual report to the Legislature from the Department of Financial Services
regarding the joint performance of the workers compensation fraud and
enforcing compliance with the workers' compensation coverage requirements
under Chapter 440.
The bill next went back in messages to the House. The House refused to concur in
the Senate amendments and sent the bill back to the Senate asking them to recede
from the amendments. The Senate, however, did not take up this House message
prior to the sine die, marking the end of the regular legislative session.
Therefore, no workers' compensation reform measures passed and current law
continues to be in effect.
The Governor has already announced plans to call the Legislature into special
session this summer, requiring them to craft workers' compensation reform that
is needed by the employers and businesses of this state.
STATE BUDGET: ON AGAIN, OFF AGAIN - George Sheldon
With one week left to go in the regular legislative session, a budget deal
between the House and Senate remains elusive. Both houses have passed their
respective budgets with a wide gap in total expenditures. The Senate spending
plan was close to one billion dollars higher than the House plan, but didn't
specify where the additional revenue would be found to pay for that budget.
Early in the week, Senate President Jim King offered the first olive branch
of the session to the House proposing that the Senate reduce its budget to a
point that it would exceed the House plan by $475 million. The House responded
with a proposal to increase certain fees and fines, reducing the difference
between the two bills to somewhere in the neighborhood of $175 million.
All day Friday, legislators waited hoping against hope that additional
progress could be made allowing the conferees to meet over the weekend. With
that hope, the word went out that just maybe the budget could be resolved before
the Friday deadline. Hour by hour went by until President King announced to the
senators that everyone was going home for the weekend -- no deal in the making.
Maybe the weekend will cool the differences, but don't count on it. In order
to adjourn with a budget in time, the budget would have to go to the printer no
later than Tuesday of next week - a tough goal to meet. Even if the leaders
decide on an amount of total revenue, the details of the budget details must be
worked out. In years past, when things appeared going nowhere, the logjam broke.
Possible this year - yes; likely - no.
If there is no budget deal next week, count on adjournment Friday and a
special session beginning June 1.
BUSINESS LEGISLATION UPDATE - Rayford Taylor
MINIMUM WAGE
Senate Bill 54, by Senator Lee Constantine, prohibits political subdivisions
of the state of Florida from requiring employers operating in Florida to pay a
minimum wage other than that established by the Federal government, passed the
Florida Senate by a vote of 22-13. The bill went to the House of
Representatives, where was adopted by a vote of 84-32. This action by the
Legislature will mean Florida employers will not be faced with having to be
concerned about different minimum wage requirements being established in
different counties in Florida, or with the fact they are required to pay higher
minimum wages for certain jobs, while their competitors in another state do not.
TAXATION
House Bill 1839, by the House Finance and Tax Committee and Representative
Randy Johnson, passed the House of Representatives this week by a vote of 113-0.
The bill amend Florida's Tax Code to conform to the changes made by the U.S.
Congress in 2002 to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The Senate adopted the bill
by a 40-0 vote. These bills simplify the paying of taxes by Florida corporations
because it keeps Florida's corporate income tax laws consistent with the Federal
system, so businesses can "piggy back" of their Federal tax return
when preparing their tax returns for Florida.
PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS
In 1995, the Florida Legislature passed the Bert Harris Private Property
Rights Act, which provided some projection to property owners who were faced
with possible government over-regulation of their property. Because of a court
decision which weakened an important section of that law, there have been bills
introduced to strengthen that law. Senate Bill 1184 by Senators Ken Pruitt and
Steven Geller passed the Florida Senate this week by a vote of 35 to 2. The bill
was awaiting consideration by the House of Representatives when the session
ended. These bills, if they had passed, would have provided additional
protection to landowners and businesses who are faced with governmental
over-regulation.
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
Last week a subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee voted for
Senate Bill 470 by Senators Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Alex Diaz de la
Portilla relating to unemployment compensation. The bill increases the amount of
unemployment compensation benefits by various amounts for people who receive
such benefits between October 1, 2003 and June 30, 2005. The bill was not
considered by the House of Representatives, so it died without additional
consideration.
No Deal in 60 Days; It Could be a Long, Hot Summer - George Sheldon
After sixty days of wrangling, hot tempers and delay after delay, the 2003
legislative session with most major issues unresolved. No workers compensation
reform, no resolution of medical malpractice, no agreement on the constitutional
mandated class size reduction or smoking ban - most significantly, no state
budget.
As Governor Bush put it Friday night, "Sixty days ago, the House and Senate
convened in Tallahassee to do the people's business. Hindered by a lack of trust
and communication, they failed to complete much of the work critical to all
Floridians."
So, where do we go from here? Governor Bush has called a special session
sixteen day special session starting May 12 to deal with the budget impasse, but
gives indication he will call other special sessions over the course of the
summer to deal with the two constitutional mandates of class size reduction and
the smoking ban, medical malpractice and workers compensation reform. The
constitutional mandates must be dealt with prior to July 1.
There is always the possibility that deals could be reached during the budget
session on the other outstanding issues, but that would take agreement by
two-thirds of both houses to expand the call to include other items. So it is
most likely that this will be a long, hot summer in Tallahassee.
Early on the difference between the House and Senate budget plans was $1.4
billion. A glimmer of hope appeared two weeks out from the end of the regular
session when Senate President Jim King offered to lower the difference to $475
million. Speaker Johnnie Byrd tentatively agreed, but even that fell through. By
Friday of last week as the session ended, President King backed off his demand
for additional revenue which could mean a quick resolution of the budget
differences, but predicted the public outcry as the cuts in services begin to be
felt necessitating another fall special session.
Attorney General Charlie Crist and some legislative leaders hope to also
revive a bill to give the attorney general greater authority to investigate
discrimination com-plaints. The legislation passed the both houses of the
legislature by overwhelming numbers, but died in the waning days when Senator
Dan Webster objected to the removal of a Senate provision requiring that
businesses accused of discriminatory practices be able to go to court within 30
days to find out the precise nature of the charges against them.
One piece of legislation did pass in the waning hours and was signed by the
Governor extending the medically needy program for two more months until a
budget agreement could be reached, otherwise 27,000 Floridians would have lost
benefits.
Maybe a week out of Tallahassee will cool tempers and bring resolution, but
count on a long, hot summer in any case.
Motorcycle Tag Bill to Benefit Prevent Blindness Florida - George Sheldon
Stiles, Taylor & Grace has lobbied to help Prevent Blindness Florida in
its efforts at vision screening and delivery of services. With so many important
issues unresolved in the recent legislative session, the House and Senate were
able to agree on legislation creating the first motorcycle prestige license tag.
Proceeds from the tag will be made available to Prevent Blindness Florida, the
Centers for Independent Living, the ABLE Trust, and the Spinal Cord Injury Trust
Fund. The legislation passed in the final hours of the session, was ordered
engrossed and enrolled and is on its way to the governor for signature. The
Governor is expected to sign the legislation, so for those of you with the
motorcycle bug be sure to do your part by buying the first motorcycle prestige
license tag in Florida when they come out later in the summer.
|